Grayling, an Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group previously unknown, has been targeting various sectors in Taiwan, including manufacturing, IT, and biomedical, since February. Notably, their activities are not confined to Taiwan. They have also aimed at a government agency in the Pacific Islands, and entities in Vietnam and the United States.

Technical Details

Distinctive Approach of Grayling

Symantec’s Threat Hunter Team recently brought to light Grayling’s unique tactics. They employ a technique known as DLL sideloading in tandem with a custom decryptor to deploy their payloads. Initial access to the target systems appears to be gained by exploiting publicly accessible infrastructures.

Early Deployment of Web Shells

Intriguingly, Grayling has been observed placing web shells on specific victim computers even before activating their DLL sideloading technique. This likely serves as a preparatory stage, ensuring that their subsequent activities can proceed without interruptions.

Variety of Payloads

Once the DLL sideloading is in effect, Grayling deploys an assortment of payloads. These include Cobalt Strike, NetSpy, and the Havoc framework. These tools serve different purposes in their operations, including privilege escalation and network scans, among others.

Sophisticated Toolset

Furthermore, Grayling uses a range of sophisticated tools for their operations. This includes employing CVE-2019-0803 for exploitation, Active Directory discovery, and Mimikatz, indicating a well-rounded and multi-faceted approach to their cyber activities.

Motives and Operational Focus

While direct data exfiltration has not been observed, the choice of sectors and the nature of tools used suggest that Grayling’s primary focus is on gathering intelligence. Their intricate methods point towards a highly skilled and sophisticated modus operandi.

Recommendations

Enhance Network Monitoring

One of the first lines of defense against APTs like Grayling is robust network monitoring. Implementation of intrusion detection systems (IDS) and intrusion prevention systems (IPS) can be particularly effective in identifying and mitigating threats in real-time.

Rigorous Patch Management

Keeping your systems updated is a necessity. CVE-2019-0803, exploited by Grayling, should be specifically patched to prevent similar attacks. Regular updates close potential entry points, making it more challenging for attackers to penetrate your systems.

Privilege Management

Adhering to the principle of least privilege can limit the potential damage an attacker could cause. Restrict user and application access to only what is essential for their tasks. This can serve as an additional layer of defense.

Employee Training and Awareness

Your staff should be well-versed in identifying phishing attempts and other forms of social engineering. Regular training can increase awareness and vigilance, aiding in the early detection of any suspicious activities.

Advanced Threat Detection Tools

Considering the sophistication of threats like Grayling, investing in advanced threat detection tools such as endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions is advisable. These tools can significantly enhance your capability to identify and respond to intricate threats.

Incident Response Plan

Having a well-structured incident response plan is imperative. Frequent updates and drills can ensure your organization can effectively respond to security breaches, reducing potential impact.

Ending Notes

The activities of Grayling APT underline the ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats, particularly those geared towards intelligence collection. Although their origins are yet to be confirmed, their focus on Taiwan and other specific regions could suggest regional interests. To defend against such advanced and persistent threats, organizations must adopt proactive measures. Rigorous network monitoring, patch management, and comprehensive employee training are key elements in building a resilient defense against these evolving threats.

Also Read: