Recent cyber threat intelligence has highlighted a novel method employed by malicious actors: embedding malicious Microsoft Word documents within seemingly benign PDF files. Termed “Polyglot Deception”, this tactic adds another layer of obscurity for threat detection tools and individuals alike.

1. Overview of the Technique

Polyglot files are unique because they conform to multiple file format specifications simultaneously. In the case of the recent threat, a single file can be opened both as a PDF and as a Word document, depending on the software used. When opened with a PDF reader, the file appears harmless. However, when the same file is opened using Microsoft Word, embedded macros or other malicious payloads can be triggered.

2. Why is This Method Used?

This method serves multiple purposes for attackers:

  • Evasion: Traditional security tools might not flag the PDF as malicious since the harmful payload is tucked within the Word document.
  • Deception: Unsuspecting users are more likely to open a PDF, considering them less likely to harbor malware than Word documents with macros.
  • Exploitation: If the user tries to open the embedded Word document, the malicious code executes.

3. How to Detect and Mitigate the Threat

  • Awareness: Users should be wary of any unexpected document attachments, regardless of their format.
  • Scanning: Employ advanced malware detection tools that can analyze embedded files.
  • File Type Restrictions: Limit the types of attachments allowed in emails, especially from unknown senders.
  • Regular Updates: Ensure that all software, especially Microsoft Word and PDF readers, are regularly updated to defend against known vulnerabilities.

Let’s break down the previously provided article using an example to further elucidate the concept of “Polyglot Deception”.

Example: The Deceptive Email

Imagine an employee, John, in a financial firm. John regularly receives PDF documents from clients containing financial statements. One day, he receives an email that appears to be from a known client, with a PDF attachment named “Financial_Statement_2023.pdf”. Trusting the source, he downloads the attachment and opens it using his PDF reader. The document displays a message: “Unable to view the content? Open with Microsoft Word.”

Curious, John opens the document using Word. Unknown to him, this triggers a malicious macro embedded within the document, installing malware on his system. This malware can then steal sensitive data or even provide a backdoor for hackers.

Analysis:

  1. Evasion: The malware evaded detection because John’s security software scanned the PDF, which appeared benign.
  2. Deception: The seemingly harmless prompt within the PDF played on John’s trust of the file format and the known client’s name.
  3. Exploitation: By following the instructions and opening the document in Word, John unknowingly executed the malicious code.

Mitigation Steps in Action:

Had John’s company taken certain precautions, this breach might have been avoided:

  • Awareness: If John had been trained to be suspicious of any file instructing him to open it with a different software, he might not have opened the Word document.
  • Scanning: Advanced malware detection tools could have flagged the embedded Word document within the PDF.
  • File Type Restrictions: If the company’s email system had been set to flag or quarantine emails with certain types of attachments, especially from external sources, the email might never have reached John.

Through this example, the risks and potential consequences of the “Polyglot Deception” technique become more tangible, emphasizing the importance of the mitigation strategies mentioned in the article.

Conclusion

While Polyglot Deception demonstrates the evolving sophistication of cyber threats, awareness and proactive measures remain the most effective defense. Organizations should bolster their security protocols and invest in continuous user education to stay a step ahead of malicious actors.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Also Read: